YPP 2024 Jury evaluation

Please evaluate the submissions by awarding them points from 1 to 5 in each of following three criteria:

• A. Technical merit is a fundamental criterion. This involves examining how well the artist has mastered the painting, the evidence of skill in brushwork, color blending, and the ability to control the medium to achieve desired effects.
• B. Originality - presenting an original idea through art can be challenging yet highly valued. This criterion assesses how the artist brings a unique perspective or a new approach to the subject matter. It's about the innovation in thought and execution that makes the artwork stand out.
• C. Composition obviously refers to how elements are arranged within the artwork. Good composition guides the viewer's eye across the painting, creating a sense of balance and harmony. Evaluate the use of space, the interplay of shapes and lines, and how these elements work together to support the overall theme or message of the piece.

Points are to be awarded according to the following valuation:

• 1 (Poor): e.g. The painting shows a lack of basic technical skills. There are visible mistakes in brushwork, proportion, color application, or other fundamental techniques.
• 2 (Below Average): e.g. The artist demonstrates some technical ability, but there are noticeable issues, such as inconsistent brushwork, muddled colors, or improper proportions.
• 3 (Average): e.g. The technical execution is competent but lacks finesse. There may be minor errors, but they do not detract significantly from the overall work.
• 4 (Above Average): e.g. The painting demonstrates strong technical skills, with only minor imperfections. Techniques are applied effectively, and the work is visually cohesive.
• 5 (Beyond Expectations): e.g. The technical execution is flawless or near-flawless. The artist shows complete mastery of their chosen medium, with no visible technical errors.